Free shell account providers

General talk about EFnet

Moderators: Website/Forum Admins, EFnet/General Moderators

Which type of shell accounts are better

Free shell accounts
Non-free shell accounts
Total votes: 23
User avatar
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 1:51 pm

Postby orange1 » Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:02 pm

try site.
Site Admin
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Postby Hardy » Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:37 pm

-- Hardy
Services Administrator admin/staff
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 6:43 am
Location: Assen, Netherlands

Postby bobjuh » Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:17 pm

A irc network of freeshells
User avatar
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 5:34 pm
Location: UK

Postby HM2K » Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:31 am

A retarded poll but still...

or pay for a shell
- HM2K -
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 12:25 am

Re: Free shell account providers

Postby bobbub » Sat Apr 25, 2009 12:35 am

I do realize this is an ancient thread, however as such google is now showing this poll about how pay-for shell accounts are better.
Let me prove the poll wrong by introducing a pleasant exception, free shell account for a quick game:
You get SSH, web (unlimited vhosts/subdomains/mysql db's), procmail, crontab, ftp, rsync, a relaxed environment (on annoying restrictions).
Basically it's free web/mail hosting (co-located on a gbit) coupled with a usable shell account for your projects.
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:16 am


Postby veerji » Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:20 am

it's also frowned upon by many users to have a bot in the channel making the logs available on the web. to avoid the bots being banned, you would need to ask permission from the channel operators from any channel that you wanted to integrate your service with. many websites have tried to monetize irc logs, and all have failed because in the end, either the logging bots get banned, or no one wants to read historical logs of lolcats.

Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests