Now that Efnet has Voted for +eI modes....

General talk about EFnet

Moderators: Website/Forum Admins, EFnet/General Moderators

What Domain or TLD do you feel will be banned MOST with the new +eI chanmodes

Poll ended at Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:05 am

*!*@*aol.com
8
22%
*!*@*online.no
6
17%
*!*@*.no
12
33%
*!*@*.pl
0
No votes
*!*@*.fr
4
11%
*!*@*netzero.net
0
No votes
*!*@*.*.*.*.*.* <-- long assed UGLY vhosts in otherwords...
1
3%
*!*@*.th
0
No votes
Other..
5
14%
 
Total votes: 36
User avatar
Auriga
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 1:29 am
Location: Canada

Now that Efnet has Voted for +eI modes....

Postby Auriga » Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:05 am

So...
What domain/tld's do you think will be the most abundantly banned on efnet now that we've got +eI coming rather quickly...

OoOoOoo What a good reason for a poll...
Efnet Operator..
RIP *.qeast.net I'll miss you! :(
Auriga is qurves slave! (is a Forum moderator)
User avatar
Pills
Forum Admin
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 1:14 pm
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

Postby Pills » Sat Aug 02, 2003 3:32 am

I'll be shocked if it's not *@*.no. I know people that ban it if one client comes into the channel from Norway.
admin, irc.umich.edu
oper, irc.servercentral.net
User avatar
deww
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 7:17 pm

Postby deww » Sat Aug 02, 2003 4:17 am

I'll be off topic. It's not a TLD at all... I say *!~*@*
Ustas
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:56 pm

Postby Ustas » Sat Aug 02, 2003 4:18 am

I would assume anything that ends with .no following by .aol. I have already banned online.no from my channels. Now thanks to +e I can ban aol from all the channels as well
You live the life you choose.
User avatar
corrupt
Site Admin
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 1:08 pm
Location: Danville, KY
Contact:

Postby corrupt » Sat Aug 02, 2003 4:03 pm

SAY NO TO .NO!
Josh Baird
[corrupt]@EFNet
O: irc.choopa.net
seiki

Postby seiki » Sat Aug 02, 2003 4:56 pm

I'd say *@* would be the most banned, with +e's for known user@hosts.

IRC channel default deny, with a hosts.allow.. ;)

-seiki
User avatar
qurve
Site Admin
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:28 am
Location: Philadelphia PA, USA

Postby qurve » Sat Aug 02, 2003 6:24 pm

Wouldn't use bans, that's what +I is for.

Set channel +i, then +I everyone who is allowed in.

-qurve
EFNet Web Lackey, and IRCop
bobjuh
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 6:43 am
Location: Assen, Netherlands
Contact:

Postby bobjuh » Sat Aug 02, 2003 8:10 pm

If you would ban *!*@*.*.*.*.*.* you also ban some normal isp like my own isp. My host is @cust.??.???.adsl.cistron.nl
User avatar
HM2K
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 5:34 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Postby HM2K » Sat Aug 02, 2003 10:27 pm

I know this might not be relivant to this topic, but I don't seem to beable to post on the "Question of the day" topic, so I presume it is locked, even though I can't clearly see where it states it is.

Anyway I have a questions...

Do we really need 'e' or 'I'

On the other hand 'd' would be a great idea, at least then I can finally get rid of those mediasentry critters!!!

Ah well enjoy.

PS...
Say no to .ku and qualitynet.net (I know it doesn't have quite the same ring to it, but it'll do)
User avatar
Auriga
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 1:29 am
Location: Canada

Postby Auriga » Sun Aug 03, 2003 1:21 am

bobjuh wrote:If you would ban *!*@*.*.*.*.*.* you also ban some normal isp like my own isp. My host is @cust.??.???.adsl.cistron.nl
Sure...
but thats what +e is for!
Silly!!

:)
Efnet Operator..
RIP *.qeast.net I'll miss you! :(
Auriga is qurves slave! (is a Forum moderator)
User avatar
holgie
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 9:15 am
Location: germany
Contact:

Postby holgie » Sun Aug 03, 2003 9:43 am

Just as corrupt said, SAY .NO to .NO .... :) end of transmission..
Last edited by holgie on Sun Aug 03, 2003 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
holgie @ efnet
User avatar
lucy
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 6:22 pm
Location: graceland
Contact:

Postby lucy » Sun Aug 03, 2003 3:17 pm

i wanna change my vote.
i'm starting to feel bad for the .no's :((
Klimpong
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 6:21 pm

Postby Klimpong » Sun Aug 03, 2003 4:03 pm

.tr is missing on the list. :twisted:
User avatar
clunked
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 5:14 pm
Location: UK

Postby clunked » Sun Aug 03, 2003 4:47 pm

Los Angeles even have their own TLD now, IS THE WORLD GOING CRAZY!?!

"The main difference between Los Angeles and yoghurt is that yoghurt has an active living culture."
- Tom Taussik (/usr/games/fortune)
sev
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 5:09 pm

uh..

Postby sev » Sun Aug 03, 2003 6:17 pm

Los Angeles has their own TLD? heheh.. surely you're not referring to .la.. (Laos)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests