Now that Efnet has Voted for +eI modes....

General talk about EFnet

Moderators: Website/Forum Admins, EFnet/General Moderators

What Domain or TLD do you feel will be banned MOST with the new +eI chanmodes

Poll ended at Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:05 am

*!*@*aol.com
8
22%
*!*@*online.no
6
17%
*!*@*.no
12
33%
*!*@*.pl
0
No votes
*!*@*.fr
4
11%
*!*@*netzero.net
0
No votes
*!*@*.*.*.*.*.* <-- long assed UGLY vhosts in otherwords...
1
3%
*!*@*.th
0
No votes
Other..
5
14%
 
Total votes: 36
User avatar
clunked
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 5:14 pm
Location: UK

Re: uh..

Postby clunked » Sun Aug 03, 2003 8:41 pm

sev wrote:Los Angeles has their own TLD? heheh.. surely you're not referring to .la.. (Laos)
thats what http://www.la/ says anyway, dunno what it is officially...
User avatar
ZyreX
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 8:26 pm
Location: Norway

Postby ZyreX » Sun Aug 03, 2003 9:58 pm

as an *.no'er, im glad i have my own domain.. with a *.org :)
Hardy
Site Admin
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway
Contact:

Re: uh..

Postby Hardy » Sun Aug 03, 2003 10:05 pm

clunked wrote:
sev wrote:Los Angeles has their own TLD? heheh.. surely you're not referring to .la.. (Laos)
thats what http://www.la/ says anyway, dunno what it is officially...
Probably the same as .ws claims it stands for "WorldSite" while it really is Samoa ( Western Samoa ) 8)
-- Hardy
Administrator: irc.underworld.no
Services Administrator
http://www.efnet.org admin/staff
Jepp
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:50 pm

Postby Jepp » Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:55 am

I really don't get what these new modes do, can anyone please help me out?
People expect more from a kid named Jepp. Jepp's not just a name, it's an idea!
User avatar
munky
Site Admin
Posts: 826
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Phoenix AZ
Contact:

Postby munky » Wed Aug 06, 2003 2:07 pm

+e == ban exempt
+I == invite exempt

so, you can +b *!*@*.no and +e *!*myfriend@sexy.lady.no, and the sexy ladies can still get in

you can also set the channel +i, and set +I *!*l33t@mofo.com, and the l33t mofo's will never need an invite
In God we trust,
Everyone else must have an X.509 certificate.
User avatar
clunked
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 5:14 pm
Location: UK

Postby clunked » Wed Aug 06, 2003 3:32 pm

munky wrote:so, you can +b *!*@*.no and +e *!*myfriend@sexy.lady.no, and the sexy ladies can still get in
And all was well in the land of IRC...
tiz
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada

Postby tiz » Wed Aug 06, 2003 6:43 pm

I'll be banning .fr.. Specifically wanadoo or whatever that is.. wanadoo is always in my server logs with sometype of hack attempt..

-tiz
User avatar
Jon
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:33 am
Location: NB.CA

Postby Jon » Thu Aug 07, 2003 5:27 am

prolly ftp scanning
wanadoo.fr gives us frenchies a bad rep :P

growing problem with @*.interbusiness.it
root
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 3:33 am
Location: Montreal, Canada
Contact:

Aww hell .no

Postby root » Sat Aug 09, 2003 3:49 am

*@*.fr is by far the worst. SO many insecure machines on that ISP and the ISP does absolutly jack about it. I run four other small nets and chat on EF and on those small nets ive had to ban the whole (for example) noos.fr ISP. Thousands, and i do mean thousands of GT bots just join and idle, killing bandwidth. To tell you the trust, getting rid of .no and .fr is probably the best choice.

Aohell too but that goes without saying.
:D
deppy
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:30 am
Location: Fairfax, VA

Postby deppy » Sun Aug 10, 2003 8:23 pm

*@*.fr is by far the worst. SO many insecure machines on that ISP and the ISP does absolutly jack about it.
It looks like you are aware, and it was just a mistake but *.fr isn't an ISP it's a CC TLD for France. :P

wanadoo is the only isp i know of over there, so it's the only one i've seen abuse come from.

Anyone up for +b'ing *!*@*.msn.* ? :twisted:
User avatar
Dario
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:33 am
Location: somewhere near Philly
Contact:

Postby Dario » Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:11 am

deppy wrote:
*@*.fr is by far the worst. SO many insecure machines on that ISP and the ISP does absolutly jack about it.
It looks like you are aware, and it was just a mistake but *.fr isn't an ISP it's a CC TLD for France. :P

wanadoo is the only isp i know of over there, so it's the only one i've seen abuse come from.

Anyone up for +b'ing *!*@*.msn.* ? :twisted:
Wow deppy knows what a Top Level Domain is...I am impressed! ;-)
Member DNRC
User avatar
slushey
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 4:11 pm
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

Postby slushey » Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:26 pm

i'll still be banning *!*@*.t-dialin.net... and I won't even have anyone +e.

~smile~ :D
Humor is the best sense we ALL have in common.

slushey ....just me
nothing more.....nothing less

"In Canada we play Duck, Duck, Moose."
Aariek
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 5:05 pm
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Hey

Postby Aariek » Wed Aug 13, 2003 6:22 pm

Happy to find that *.ro is not a threat to the EFnet :twisted:
Note: Before replying to this post, take a moment to read http://www.artelekom.net/legal . Aditionally, please make sure to quote the lines you are replying to.

Yours trully,
Aariek (ACS18-RIPE)
The kewt puppy
aariekje@comcast.net
dawg
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 2:28 pm
Location: Kalimdor, Orgrimmar
Contact:

Next question at hand

Postby dawg » Fri Aug 15, 2003 4:21 pm

So, now that we got these new ereet modes, when are we gonna get +d back? :D
User avatar
Jon
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:33 am
Location: NB.CA

Postby Jon » Sat Aug 16, 2003 5:30 pm

Aariek : wow.... a whole new level of lameness :)

I think .ro isn`t a threat to Efnet *yet* because only 10% of the people know how to actually connect to a server.

on a good note, i think you can still purchase a .ro domain for a one time fee, and domain is good for life ?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests