Page 2 of 3

Re: uh..

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2003 8:41 pm
by clunked
sev wrote:Los Angeles has their own TLD? heheh.. surely you're not referring to .la.. (Laos)
thats what http://www.la/ says anyway, dunno what it is officially...

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2003 9:58 pm
by ZyreX
as an *.no'er, im glad i have my own domain.. with a *.org :)

Re: uh..

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2003 10:05 pm
by Hardy
clunked wrote:
sev wrote:Los Angeles has their own TLD? heheh.. surely you're not referring to .la.. (Laos)
thats what http://www.la/ says anyway, dunno what it is officially...
Probably the same as .ws claims it stands for "WorldSite" while it really is Samoa ( Western Samoa ) 8)

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:55 am
by Jepp
I really don't get what these new modes do, can anyone please help me out?

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2003 2:07 pm
by munky
+e == ban exempt
+I == invite exempt

so, you can +b *!*@*.no and +e *!*myfriend@sexy.lady.no, and the sexy ladies can still get in

you can also set the channel +i, and set +I *!*l33t@mofo.com, and the l33t mofo's will never need an invite

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2003 3:32 pm
by clunked
munky wrote:so, you can +b *!*@*.no and +e *!*myfriend@sexy.lady.no, and the sexy ladies can still get in
And all was well in the land of IRC...

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2003 6:43 pm
by tiz
I'll be banning .fr.. Specifically wanadoo or whatever that is.. wanadoo is always in my server logs with sometype of hack attempt..

-tiz

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2003 5:27 am
by Jon
prolly ftp scanning
wanadoo.fr gives us frenchies a bad rep :P

growing problem with @*.interbusiness.it

Aww hell .no

Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 3:49 am
by root
*@*.fr is by far the worst. SO many insecure machines on that ISP and the ISP does absolutly jack about it. I run four other small nets and chat on EF and on those small nets ive had to ban the whole (for example) noos.fr ISP. Thousands, and i do mean thousands of GT bots just join and idle, killing bandwidth. To tell you the trust, getting rid of .no and .fr is probably the best choice.

Aohell too but that goes without saying.
:D

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 8:23 pm
by deppy
*@*.fr is by far the worst. SO many insecure machines on that ISP and the ISP does absolutly jack about it.
It looks like you are aware, and it was just a mistake but *.fr isn't an ISP it's a CC TLD for France. :P

wanadoo is the only isp i know of over there, so it's the only one i've seen abuse come from.

Anyone up for +b'ing *!*@*.msn.* ? :twisted:

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:11 am
by Dario
deppy wrote:
*@*.fr is by far the worst. SO many insecure machines on that ISP and the ISP does absolutly jack about it.
It looks like you are aware, and it was just a mistake but *.fr isn't an ISP it's a CC TLD for France. :P

wanadoo is the only isp i know of over there, so it's the only one i've seen abuse come from.

Anyone up for +b'ing *!*@*.msn.* ? :twisted:
Wow deppy knows what a Top Level Domain is...I am impressed! ;-)

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:26 pm
by slushey
i'll still be banning *!*@*.t-dialin.net... and I won't even have anyone +e.

~smile~ :D

Hey

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2003 6:22 pm
by Aariek
Happy to find that *.ro is not a threat to the EFnet :twisted:

Next question at hand

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2003 4:21 pm
by dawg
So, now that we got these new ereet modes, when are we gonna get +d back? :D

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2003 5:30 pm
by Jon
Aariek : wow.... a whole new level of lameness :)

I think .ro isn`t a threat to Efnet *yet* because only 10% of the people know how to actually connect to a server.

on a good note, i think you can still purchase a .ro domain for a one time fee, and domain is good for life ?